There have been many posts lately on ASMP’s Pro/Student forum about pricing issues, like standardizing usage prices. I’ve been trying to offer my opinions while staying out of the fray, but I’m getting frustrated with some of the debate. People get very emotional about these issues and then it gets difficult for them to look at ideas dispassionately before jumping to conclusions about their merit, etc.
As readers here know, I think the idea of standardizing usage licensing prices is at the least interesting and worthy of further investigation. One of the arguments against it is that it isn’t done that way; another is that no one should get to dictate prices. I think neither of these attitudes is helpful in looking at possibilities.
The WGA is looking at new methods and models for pricing usage for the creative products of its members. They seem to understand that just because something wasn’t done that way in the past (or was done, sort of, but didn’t work in the past) doesn’t mean it might not work now. Why can’t we in the photo industry get that?
Life and business and technology (etc.) are changing at incredible speeds and we have to be willing to look at ideas openly in order to find best possibilities for us all. What was may not be now; or what was, then wasn’t, may be again. Who knows? But if we dig in our heels and say “This is the way it is done. Period” we’re going to be left on the side of the road with our egos intact and our businesses in shambles.
The other side of this coin are those people who say things like “Creative Commons licensing is here to stay so we have to accept giving away usage.” They are only seeing that one issue in monetizing creativity and basing everything on it. Equally but differently blindered, so to speak.
Today there are a billion outlets for creative material usage and each set of those uses may require different methodologies for pricing. Today sure as hell ain’t yesterday and tomorrow will be completely different, so you better wear a cup, as they say. But during this fundamental transitional period, we owe it to our businesses (and to the value of our creativity) to look at all the monetizing ideas possible–no matter how crazy or against the previous grain they might be–before rejecting any out of hand.
Then, if (huge if) any new methods gain endorsement from any of the major photo groups, each business owner will still get to pick her/his own way. Even if prices are standardized, no one will dictate them and no one will be forced to use the suggested standardized prices, for example. As always, it will be a choice. Just like today where photographer A uses FotoQuote to price a gig while photographer B throws in all rights for a tiny sum–each makes his her own choice and lives with the consequences.
But as a group, we can and should look at what the changes in media and technology bring to the table. New methods for monetization are certainly possible if not probable. Let’s see what our best minds can come up with. After all, they said no one would ever pay $4 for a cup of coffee (Starbucks) or buy books online (Amazon), and Google has broken every “rule” about monetizing anything and made one hell of a business.